From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 15:09:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F3516A420 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:09:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D6243D68 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:09:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A800117208; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:09:28 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:09:28 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Parv Message-ID: <20060228170928.499b942f@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20060228141741.GB33788@holestein.holy.cow> References: <867j7gd8kw.fsf@PECTOPAH.shenton.org> <20060228083210.GI13185@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org> <20060228103912.GA166@pentarou.parodius.com> <20060228154636.3e114177@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20060228141741.GB33788@holestein.holy.cow> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeremy Chadwick , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which ports store/use OPTIONS (/var/db/ports/portname/options)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:09:34 -0000 On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:17:41 -0500 Parv wrote: > in message <20060228154636.3e114177@it.buh.tecnik93.com>, wrote > Ion-Mihai Tetcu thusly... > > > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:39:12 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick > > wrote: > ... > > > Personally, I've never liked OPTIONS > ... > > > especially if the port author changes some of the OPTIONS names > > > between port revisions > ... > > Indeed when OPTIONS change, either in meaning or in number > > (OPTIONS added/removed) currently there's no warning for the user. > > I have implemented something in two of my ports for this and I > > will submit a patch for bsd.port.mk shortly. > > Ion-Mihai, i thank you for your effort for the above mentioned patch. Well, better wait to see the results first :) > (Hurry up! :) The current version requires complete maintainer cooperation which usually worked well in the past for me and myself :) but I'd like to avoid (like in automate) that whenever possible ;) There is no way to avoid it when OPTIONS change their meaning and other subtle changes (this is of course discouraged because of breaking POLA, but sometimes one has to follow vendor ideas :-/ ) -- IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #115: your keyboard's space bar is generating spurious keycodes