From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 10 08:58:30 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA16174 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 08:58:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za (zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za [146.64.24.58]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA16160 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 08:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jhay@localhost) by zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za (8.6.12/8.6.9) id RAA05040; Wed, 10 Apr 1996 17:56:01 +0200 From: John Hay Message-Id: <199604101556.RAA05040@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> Subject: Re: IPX routing? To: mmead@Glock.COM (matthew c. mead) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 17:56:00 +0200 (SAT) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199604101315.JAA00810@neon.Glock.COM> from "matthew c. mead" at Apr 10, 96 09:15:06 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8b] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > John Hay writes: > > > > Has anyone done any IPX routing on FreeBSD? > > > We are using it here at the company I work for. It is mostly the stuff in > > FreeBSD-current. The main problem with it at the moment is the handling > > of type 20 (Netbios) packets. I am currently testing it here and will > > commit it when I am happy with that. > > Hmm. How feasible would it be to get that code running > under 2.1.0R? If it's not very feasible I may update my proxyarp > gateway box to -current since it's been pretty stable lately. > The reason I want to be able to route IPX packets between > interfaces is because I have two machines hanging off one 10baseT > port in my apartment and want to do IPX network stuff (mainly > games) with other people on the subnet in my apartment complex. > > -matt > I think it will be a lot easier to use -current, if you can live with the idea of possibly getting an unstable snapshot. John -- John Hay -- John.Hay@csir.co.za