From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 5 14:28:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.122.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE6037B443 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:28:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f35LSoQ88000; Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:28:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Aman Sharma Cc: Subject: Re: your mail In-Reply-To: <20010405183623.84853.qmail@web13201.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: X-All-Your-Base: are belong to us MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Aman Sharma wrote: > > ************ project ************* > ********** kldload ufs *********** > i feel that a real microkernel OS should'nt have a > bloated kernel in the sense, that heavy OS equipment > like a FileSystem should run as a module on top of the > kernel. > i aim to make ufs run as a module on FreeBSD, which > surely would require a lot of serious kernel > code<-entry points. It shouldn't be too bad as long as you force the loader to load the module, otherwise you run into a chicken & egg problem. Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message