From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 21 01:29:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4132716A4CF for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 01:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pion19.tphys.physik.uni-tuebingen.de (pion19.tphys.physik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.78.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3212743D48 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 01:29:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from epple@tphys.physik.uni-tuebingen.de) Received: from axion01.tphys.physik.uni-tuebingen.de (axion01.tphys.physik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.78.148]) id i3L8TVe8015342 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:29:31 +0200 Received: from axion01.tphys.physik.uni-tuebingen.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 0.7) with ESMTP id i3L8TUXt001818 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:29:30 +0200 Received: (from epple@localhost)i3L8TU6w001817 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:29:30 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:29:30 +0200 From: Dominik Epple To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040421082930.GA1708@axion01.tphys.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> References: <200404192007.04848.vangyzen@stat.duke.edu> <200404192026.56856.vangyzen@stat.duke.edu> <20040420021016.GA20421@aurema.com> <200404201122.01824.vangyzen@stat.duke.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200404201122.01824.vangyzen@stat.duke.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Single-Letter Port Names X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:29:33 -0000 On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 11:22:01AM -0400, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > > If you're reducing this to a single package, please do not have it > > default to *any* size, but require all users to set their size by some > > means at install or run time. An environment variable in /etc/profile > > (or similar) should be good enough for this, and could possibly > > benefit other ports too. Perhaps this does not fit here, but: One of the most annoying things that can happen when doing sth like a "portupgrade -ra" (or similar) is when a port thinks it should ask the user a question and therefore the machine idles for, say, worst case, some days waiting for the user to select a paper size or whatever. I usually do not sit in front of a computer while it is recompiling all its packages, and when I check back and find the machine waiting for input instead of having completed the upgrade, I am annoyed. Just my 0.02 EUR. Regards, Dominik.