From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Mar 10 13: 7:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CBD151FB for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:07:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.2/8.9.1) id WAA79545; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 22:07:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Update of ports/lang/cim From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 10 Mar 1999 22:07:03 +0100 Message-ID: Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Our cim port is outdated; it installs cim 2.10 whereas the latest production version is 3.29. I have an updated port waiting to be committed, but there's one thing I don't understand: the current cim port is marked broken for Elf ("bad library version number") even though it builds, installs and works perfectly (as far as I've been able to test it) when the BROKEN_ELF line is removed. Why is it a bad thing to install libraries with more than a single-digit version number? Every other operating system I know of supports this (although I'm not sure how the minor version number is interpreted or if it is ignored). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message