From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 1 02:05:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F375416A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 02:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail003.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail003.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0FD43D45 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 02:05:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c211-30-75-229.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.75.229]) i5195YN02034; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:05:34 +1000 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1])i5195XRu017383; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:05:33 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i5195XU6017382; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:05:33 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:05:33 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: asfdqwer xzcvdsf Message-ID: <20040601090532.GA17214@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <20040530154955.97006.qmail@web21322.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040530154955.97006.qmail@web21322.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc questions / comments / rambelings X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 09:05:57 -0000 On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 08:49:55AM -0700, asfdqwer xzcvdsf wrote: >Now that I have current running I've noticed >that the OS is using much more memory, it seemed >like there was always 1700Mb free now its >always around 700Mb. I'm guessing here but >the machine seems to be caching more aggresivly, >which I think is good, right? IMHO, 'free memory' is not a particularly useful measure on any modern Un*x. As long as you're above the "serious memory shortage" level (a few MB), the actual number is not particularly useful. Of more interest would be how the kernel is actually using memory. This is reported by things like 'systat -v', 'netstat -m' and 'vmstat -m'. Peter