Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:40:00 +0400 From: Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> Cc: B Briggs <rcbdyndns@bellsouth.net>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Stanislav Sedov <ssedov@mbsd.msk.ru> Subject: Re: devel/fam build failure Message-ID: <20060816064000.GA28341@underworld.novel.ru> In-Reply-To: <44E2B800.2000205@FreeBSD.org> References: <ebsorm$1s02$1@FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw> <44E218A7.8020505@bellsouth.net> <20060815231002.6bca0c83@localhost> <44E2B800.2000205@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Stanislav Sedov wrote: > > They are merely two different implementations of FAM subsystem: one > > from SGI, another from RedHat. I belive, that SGI's one is sligthly > > faster currently. Also, it covers standard completely contradictory to > > gamin. >=20 > Does any of them use kqueue(2)? IIRC, gamin patched to use kqueue and I don't know about fam. --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBROK9wIB0WzgdqspGAQIwNAQAgvmy+rtV/8gCn5QdbJh5S6EKOlECfE6B 3Dmdv4t9ntx5FNbbuIEbMkX7wMkXQcdh1D1BBfgYYb0lp9cCUQXyOSCWTBSIkimK fo0OXu9g44bukWISYylSLXMt6jboFFeY+x5gh0g6bsEHRkSJc6v4AF7usvsUm8ig RqR+aQFgqOQ= =wVsS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060816064000.GA28341>