Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:30:08 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ./options-descr file suggestion for ports Message-ID: <1181860208.83180.13.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <A2E1DABC-0F0E-475C-B282-0CC07C4278B5@khera.org> References: <200706090936.51775.david@vizion2000.net> <20070609203316.GC71246@voodoo.bawue.com> <20070611151636.GA16517@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <822946050706120826r75835defj2dbf76fc2ecfccb6@mail.gmail.com> <20070613093658.dk1r5iud8gssss0o@webmail.leidinger.net> <A2E1DABC-0F0E-475C-B282-0CC07C4278B5@khera.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-oR2cZZQfacHflUUiRQ+f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Vivek Khera p=ED=B9e v st 13. 06. 2007 v 10:26 -0400:
> personally, I'm annoyed by ports that use OPTIONS because I cannot =20
> then set them globally in my make.conf file (which is copied around =20
> to all my servers). I have to ensure that the proper OPTIONS are set =20
> on every machine on which I may build a port.
>=20
> Is it possible (and/or is anyone working on) a way to make the =20
> options setting non-interactive and pull the settings from a config =20
> file instead?
Is there a problem with copying /var/db/ports around, instead of
make.conf?
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
No one expects the spanish inquisition.
--=-oR2cZZQfacHflUUiRQ+f
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBGccFtntdYP8FOsoIRAlraAJ0ctuekbZIjQ+WKiOg5qd4+FcmicwCfS6oO
GrkppRKXCd5LYPxsnTxwdfU=
=Ljjx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-oR2cZZQfacHflUUiRQ+f--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1181860208.83180.13.camel>