From owner-freebsd-net Mon May 7 11: 3:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (c421509-a.pinol1.sfba.home.com [24.7.86.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02D537B422 for ; Mon, 7 May 2001 11:03:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from elischer.org (InterJet.elischer.org [192.168.1.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA82332; Mon, 7 May 2001 11:38:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3AF6D25B.A3DF88B@elischer.org> Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 09:50:35 -0700 From: Julian Elischer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shaun Dwyer Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bridging and link bonding with netgraph References: <3AEEE8A0.EE9B2651@bigpond.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Shaun Dwyer wrote: > > For configuring netgraph for bridging, i used the example script in > /usr/share/examples/netgraph/ether.bridge . > > Is this to be expected when using netgraph for bridging? or is it > because of some piece of hardware i was using, or something else? > I dont think pocessor power was an issue, because it only peaked at > 20% (from systat -vmstat). We've heard many rumours of this 'variation' in netgraph throughput but never been able to pin it down to anything particular. Theoretically there shouldn't be any problem but in theory and practice only agree in threory.. In practice theory and practice tend to differ.. :-) between what values dod the varioations in ping time vary? julian > -- __--_|\ Julian Elischer / \ julian@elischer.org ( OZ ) World tour 2000-2001 ---> X_.---._/ v To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message