From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 17 22:03:17 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E0E106566C;
	Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:03:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com)
Received: from EXHUB015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net
	(exhub015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.95])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200928FC16;
	Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:03:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (173.66.131.225) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net
	(207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.358.0;
	Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:03:16 -0700
Message-ID: <4A60F51F.7030300@p6m7g8.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:03:11 -0400
From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>
Organization: P6 Web Applications
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
References: <20090717090530.GS60681@droso.net> <op.uw8bqtnq9aq2h7@localhost>
	<op.uw8d7yxx9aq2h7@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <op.uw8d7yxx9aq2h7@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP]: Ports freeze schedule for 8.0-RELEASE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:03:17 -0000

Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> It would be great if someone can test www/apache20 and www/apache22.
> Maybe there is no issue, since all patches are similar in and take from
> apache SVN.

I'm getting there....