From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 21 12:03:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6210C1065741 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:03:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943248FC0A for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id OAA20613 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:03:45 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4F69C3A0.5080008@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:03:44 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120221 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: "stop scheduler on panic" for stable/[98] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:03:47 -0000 I feel that I can not assess a balance between risks and benefits of merging the "stop scheduler on panic" changes to stable/9 and stable/8 (after 8.3 release). What is your impression/opinion/assessment? Thank you! -- Andriy Gapon