Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Oct 2012 10:40:13 -0400
From:      Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
To:        Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
Cc:        "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Bryan Drewery <bryan@shatow.net>
Subject:   Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program
Message-ID:  <CAF6rxgmcJ%2Bj3RG=A6snizCi1t0eEiu3erP9RWMUtzaLXyW2bOA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADLo83_DHJB1BMMscMYQxinqQjSKmboadA3pi=zhrQzf5%2Bx7MQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201210020750.23358.jhb@freebsd.org> <201210021037.27762.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAGH67wQffjVHqFw_eN=mfeg-Ac2Z6XBT5Hv72ev0kjjx7YH7SA@mail.gmail.com> <127FA63D-8EEE-4616-AE1E-C39469DDCC6A@xcllnt.net> <20121025211522.GA32636@dragon.NUXI.org> <3F52B7C9-A7B7-4E0E-87D0-1E67FE5D0BA7@xcllnt.net> <CAGH67wRw_n2_KwVz=DZkMpeJ4t8mMf965nxehHsDV-mzTnn5cA@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo839EUTF9bP8VD3L1_boY8i-w8B87yHGRR7Zx6wONFnSnEQ@mail.gmail.com> <20121025221244.GG3808@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20121026181152.GC44331@dragon.NUXI.org> <CADLo838vSnYm3LMr_6maQipAYtBTX%2BCCyEhC053cj_amgNJH=g@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83-d0tDN8k5Lv9c5=6vQawVHSHZENfTpKzxe61OYqqxSeA@mail.gmail.com> <20121026204910.E1FFA58094@chaos.jnpr.net> <CADLo8383Y823kqKgBLHfx9CdCDuZQgVQSYwfuWq_29Hq7cYv=Q@mail.gmail.com> <20121026233225.54FB858094@chaos.jnpr.net> <CADLo839LZOdMp%2B%2B3PnbN91%2B5Lfzvm=_GNRRfVdVATYcXm9BVJg@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo838geLFZT4EH8sPuichUn8cw7D8pBQOgiQbEu2BCuTDwiw@mail.gmail.com> <508BF062.8020101@shatow.net> <CADLo83_DHJB1BMMscMYQxinqQjSKmboadA3pi=zhrQzf5%2Bx7MQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 October 2012 10:34, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This "weeks" is making a assumptions that users 1. reads ports@ or 2.
>> Update to security/errata patches in a timely manner or 3. Read UPDATING
>
> Quite.  This should be at least a few months, otherwise we're making
> unreasonable requests of our users, and yet again annoy them by
> breaking older versions-- this time with no real benefit for
> end-users.

+1

I would venture to guess that most of our users don't even read -announce.

In addition there are non-ports concerns here.  Many people probably
have custom Makefiles they use for their own projects which may rely
on existing behavior.


-- 
Eitan Adler



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmcJ%2Bj3RG=A6snizCi1t0eEiu3erP9RWMUtzaLXyW2bOA>