From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 17 11:42:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from squall.waterspout.com (squall.waterspout.com [208.13.56.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3010237B422; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 11:42:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by squall.waterspout.com (Postfix, from userid 1050) id 58C379B19; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:41:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:41:19 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Martin Blapp Cc: wpaul@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD unfinished NIS+ implementation in Linux ? Message-ID: <20020217194119.GD58005@squall.waterspout.com> Mail-Followup-To: Martin Blapp , wpaul@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org References: <20020217155122.J17787-100000@levais.imp.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020217155122.J17787-100000@levais.imp.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.26i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 03:57:59PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote: > Bill, did you ever allowed them to make it GPL only ? Looking at the code > it should be possible to import some things and make a NIS+ client > available. But only if it's not GPL'd. Interesting. I looked as nisgrep/nisgrep.c and noticed that the code structure was basically the same, but the variables were just slightly different... -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message