From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jan  6 12:25:30 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from boco.fee.vutbr.cz (boco.fee.vutbr.cz [147.229.9.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AA3156D0
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  6 Jan 2000 12:25:24 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from cejkar@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz)
Received: from kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz (kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz [147.229.8.12])
	by boco.fee.vutbr.cz (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA43951;
	Thu, 6 Jan 2000 21:24:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from cejkar@localhost)
	by kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA30411;
	Thu, 6 Jan 2000 21:24:04 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 21:24:04 +0100
From: Cejka Rudolf <cejkar@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz>
To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: saper@system.pl, yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp
Subject: Re: syscons: SC_MOUSE_CHAR value rationale
Message-ID: <20000106212404.A30244@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <no.id>; from saper@system.pl on Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 09:46:46PM +0100
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Marcin Cieslak wrote (2000/01/05):
> Is there any _particular_ reason why this is #define'd to (0xd0)
> in /sys/dev/syscons/syscons.c?