From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug  1 07:41:38 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC153FB
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Aug 2013 07:41:38 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-vb0-x236.google.com (mail-vb0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::236])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 347412F5B
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Aug 2013 07:41:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id q14so1721056vbe.41
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=pX1cFR6E4/F8eT5yYjQjAkFVlXeqCGwgVBMdcT9y0mY=;
 b=JoOpwPaeKAAhWHEU08S5AWL+bvwPTDVOI/hd/rr4YVcy66fMuP+RwUVG0NJZ8maw6s
 P+yuRs/R5bqztoApdfO9cL0wcWsZIgNyw3xxPx3SB5BkPf7f/wR0Db/c1rMkhP3pe81G
 asS4gES+wYNWSvJ4f9g3eEltGk59wn0FIPjqq3z44EKOGYPYw11Kg4zl3IgoGoQed6Jg
 iPl5rS6lIHuiNnXu2PnkrB8mKSfJ3m5sXc6OLkK5u+yZu+R6dJSHEFAPCjentIHEuA+D
 Wc7SpbzArHtBo1MjHAkUerjTbkT8I9ENJ9ZxF1qUZSPO/84Hxtbnfa/DoCxSseQo7WsW
 qftA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.20.3 with SMTP id d3mr73697vcb.55.1375342897136; Thu, 01
 Aug 2013 00:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.38.134 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 00:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABXB=RQdycdQKGbOh2tNvzyTpOGSyq6hCAFj=5BAHPMtg90YKQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAoTqfvmsYc=fE9AZyzf9GKBtbazdu+3jmD5TjhMqQHDnrtrkw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAoTqfsftjLQMLZpnwtPJYV2gKEn3kumYVycKroi5+aEbjEoJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAoTqftbCS_g45e6m9tXhR0wc3Q5-9kWmUDCANX597h8DRQakg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAoTqfuqYkgHg9--wev8Qji7fVvDVB-BVdP1hO=KD4SfuP-RXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAoTqftW2KJtQnZpk=DV6snXyu21agdaX_8ku0+623FDVW71gw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAoTqfv_XAwCUkBh4WFhdNTEe7wZ4_Sbpis3OCacUrwoT-p4NA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABXB=RQdycdQKGbOh2tNvzyTpOGSyq6hCAFj=5BAHPMtg90YKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:41:37 +0400
Message-ID: <CAAoTqfu+Yt5cd+OwXqesNcJqatLiZgOssYgLB0CD6ot+Ep6-KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Strange sendmail behaviour after upgrade to 9.1-BETA2
From: Pavel Timofeev <timp87@gmail.com>
To: J David <j.david.lists@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 07:41:38 -0000

I tried, but it didn't work.
# grep ip /etc/rc.conf
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="NO"
ipv6_network_interfaces="none"
ip6addrctl_enable="NO"
ip6addrctl_policy="ipv4_prefer"
# ip6addrctl show
no source-address-selection policy is installed

Or I did it wrong?

2013/7/31 J David <j.david.lists@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Pavel Timofeev <timp87@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've just installed new fresh 9.2-BETA2 amd64 on another machine.
>> Same behavior - Sendmail asks DNS only for AAAA record of mx server.
>
> We also noticed one of our machines suddenly started using IPv6 to
> send outbound email (from Postfix rather than Sendmail) after it was
> upgraded from 8.4 to 9-STABLE a bit ago.
>
> I think there's been a change in the default IPv6 behavior between 8
> and 9.  Probably one of the many important things in UPDATING that
> always seems to slip past me.
>
> We use IPv6 extensively, so we were pleased after the initial
> surprise, but if you don't then ip6addrctl is probably the right
> temporary answer until you do.