From owner-freebsd-office@freebsd.org Mon Mar 8 11:13:33 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0907256E67E for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluffy@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DvG186lrMz4VPg for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluffy@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E7CD056E3FD; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: office@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E785D56EB28; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluffy@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DvG186DPpz4V7W; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluffy@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (host.212-19-20-216.broadband.redcom.ru [212.19.20.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: fluffy) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBD3899E8; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluffy@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 21:13:25 +1000 From: Dima Panov To: =?utf-8?Q?T=C4=B3l_Coosemans?= Cc: office , FreeBSD Ports Message-ID: <167d684c-9076-46b6-ac43-1e370e084fdf@Canary> In-Reply-To: <20210307112831.004a2aea@FreeBSD.org> References: <13e81c71-82f3-46e2-94ea-40179a80f4f1@Canary> <20210307112831.004a2aea@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Call for testing: LibreOffice 7.1.1 release MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="604606d5_419ac241_1179c"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:13:33 -0000 --604606d5_419ac241_1179c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Moin=21 Thanks for report. gt3 vcl is not fully complete yet ans we (team) prefer to keep qt5 as def= ault -- Dima. (desktop, kde, x11, office, ports-secteam)=40=46reeBSD team (fluffy=40=46reeBSD.org, https://t.me/dima=5Fpanov) > On Sunday, Mar 07, 2021 at 8:28 PM, T=C4=B3l Coosemans wrote: > On =46ri, 5 Mar 2021 01:16:40 +1000 Dima Panov = wrote: > > Hello=21 > > > > LibreOffice 7.1.1 release is out and office=40=46reeBSD team calls ev= eryone interested to join us in testing cycle > > > > Our WIP repository available at GitHub, https://github.com/freebsd/fr= eebsd-ports-libreoffice. > > Of course, we support ports=E2=80=99 OVERLAY feature by adding: > > > > OVERLAYS+=3D/path/to/freebsd-ports-libreoffice > > > > to /etc/make.conf > > > > Poudriere users should follows next steps: > > > > sudo poudriere ports -c -=46 -p portoverlay > > cd =24=7BLOCALBASE=7D/poudriere/ports/portsoverlay > > git clone https://github.com/lwhsu/freebsd-ports-libreoffice . > > git checkout master > > poudriere bulk -j 122amd64 -p portstree -O portsoverlay editors/libre= office > > > > You can start the LibreOffice with x11 UI backend by setting > > environment variable: > > > > SAL=5FUSE=5FVCLPLUGIN=3Dgen > > > > where =E2=80=98gen=E2=80=99 can be replaced by x11, gtk3, qt5, kf5, d= epends on selected build options to get a required vcl active > > > > Qt5 vcl is already locked to use cairo font renderer. > > > > Patches and suggestions are welcome=21 > > With the 7.1.0 version I'm using the gtk3 backend again and haven't > noticed any problems yet. If others can confirm that, maybe it can be > made the default again when you commit 7.1.1=3F --604606d5_419ac241_1179c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Canary PGP V3 iQJVBAABCgA/OBxEaW1hIFBhbm92IChGcmVlQlNELk9SRyBDb21taXR0ZXIpIDxm bHVmZnlARnJlZUJTRC5PUkc+BQJgRgbVAAoJEPuLoJ3VOY8pSG8QAOgiHZ/ElMUG 2liymCxOncPtBgUYEPXsA4jVRPpcRgPs0NqPLHZtppcEzOrpUvcmVyD0lFmWYwFa +tH+2eMyXkFWUs+C6HMLvYJwgOjqWqmAIuLfWPjKrjjd2M72Q3eSZdCA2/8GFBnN jGU6TZrQhYMDyu+YXOEb573I3N+i3tGVzO52FfnOprbkkZ0/1awIHmIu+QwGVf1j t+poQO538mKd824sd13/KHdCKVkEX1zaCnFE8VX+YVH1DQXJlikGfN+HIq7y8pmV tU/f31l9J19el6OVks4jiWHPlnxOZnXlLgUnjTd4G6d+yficRLtKRF5377Tn+YqT Mu+PxJvuOfrvjVPVE6XygyMcuroQE2FtZ06lBfkahFniE9l2WennOudk4B5CkLIi uGXMNyDdbl9SZglQo6rCcjuWobYrPoxAgz5PspyF3taL2nHrz31bgIHTb2m/6eNc rT1SxraN1aAmLJoQJlvDNqMX/U+3R7db9wOwO0OMEZLLAjGVA9IVkTgVsUTSQDqZ Jv/kJOI6sjSiYtnM7rPWb2WSAGR10CmXMoAOtb8OsLXumfHisMITxNvuy6LT0tnC k9IzdEQq6vwuGoQwZyDLodwrcZjnIOrBNNBmaWHbH28svO6lPx0/xAms6m/Olx/E 087EClxVJmPo39egCiXADsxr9KG9aCre =hePw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --604606d5_419ac241_1179c--