From owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 11 20:50:33 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 746A816A4E7; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:50:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C81E343D1F; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:50:32 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dean@dragon.stack.nl)
Received: from dragon.stack.nl (dragon.stack.nl
	[IPv6:2001:610:1108:5011:207:e9ff:fe09:230])
	by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9221F168;
	Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:50:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dragon.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 1600)
	id CA7C15F31F; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:50:31 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:50:31 +0100
From: Dean Strik <dean@stack.nl>
To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20050311205031.GA24646@dragon.stack.nl>
References: <20050310125438.P35964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050310125438.P35964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
X-Editor: VIM Rulez! http://www.vim.org/
X-MUD: Outerspace - telnet://mud.stack.nl:3333
X-Really: Yes
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
cc: atm@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Users of netatm/HARP
X-BeenThere: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: ATM for FreeBSD! <freebsd-atm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-atm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-atm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-atm>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-atm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-atm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-atm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-atm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:50:33 -0000

Harti Brandt wrote:
> the netatm directory containing the HARP code is basically unmaintained. 
> Giving that most of the usual ATM stuff can now also be done with NgATM it 
> is intented to remove netatm at one point in HEAD. The one missing piece 
> in NgATM that netatm does is CLIP over signalled connections. I have some 
> code for this that worked with earlier versions of NgATM, but I doubt that 
> I have enough time in the next view months to actual bring this into 
> current.
> 
> So the question is: what would break for whom if we remove netatm?

ForeIP and SPANS? :)

But I don't think supporting these is worth the trouble and IMHO harp
can be retired now...

-- 
Dean C. Strik             Eindhoven University of Technology
dean@stack.nl  |  dean@ipnet6.org  |  http://www.ipnet6.org/
"This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli