From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 05:40:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2296E106564A for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976CD8FC12 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so209124lag.13 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:40:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:x-gm-message-state:content-type; bh=xLbCIGDucazuGreJz9rvR7WPcjWbtRcFI6lyQz151cI=; b=Z6GSbe0kW+mBBdjfY13zFh4wopA0Vz5y40UFbzaf9TOErhHcXRavSsp5p32BCGjx75 lPyncXEJV6ICHruo3YJ/1op1pXqB6PH8H76HRlY0WXMFDpBKkxHVgN/ZHZGUJTsQJiey 7RxIfsipq/WZbFNWkKBRWMTEefQTxNrc9n58Y= Received: by 10.112.82.226 with SMTP id l2mr912859lby.102.1327209400251; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:16:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.25.196 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:16:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120121161108.000074bc@unknown> References: <4F1A7DF7.4060603@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120121161108.000074bc@unknown> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:16:09 -0500 Message-ID: To: Alexander Leidinger X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnOnf8PRCHfATm3yV0zUwD4sgKPIGrUBCW/57wcpUITrRBBQqKE7uND1PzCaXlVDBzn2E/7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux-threads X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:40:51 -0000 On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > It is not a linuxulator port. It is doing what the old linux threads > lib was doing (each thread is a process), just on FreeBSD. There was a > timeframe where this gave better performance for the native MySQL than > our default threads lib. Now our threads lib is better, and we do not > need the linuxthreads ports anymore. Any objection to deprecation and removal in 2 months? -- Eitan Adler