Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:31:13 -0600 From: Graham Allan <allan@physics.umn.edu> To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mps driver on 10.2-BETA Message-ID: <563BAE81.6000409@physics.umn.edu> In-Reply-To: <55DF6F1F.9070909@physics.umn.edu> References: <55DE5365.6090608@physics.umn.edu> <CAD%2BeXGTSPKuz=OcJ=LJ-S25eijCzAreNKhB22gQXQ=ONm1FLUw@mail.gmail.com> <55DF1F78.2080204@physics.umn.edu> <55DF6F1F.9070909@physics.umn.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/27/2015 3:12 PM, Graham Allan wrote: > On 8/27/2015 9:32 AM, Graham Allan wrote: >> >> I have another system which isn't in production yet - I can do the same >> test on that and see if the newer 20.00.00.04 is stable. This is also >> running 9.3 but the test should still be valid. I will be using this >> system for 10.2 testing, but would like to keep it on 9.3 for a short >> time to try and resolve any issues with that. > > I updated the firmware on this HBA to 20.00.04.00 and ran some stress > tests - all looks fine after 4+ hours. I'm pretty certain that issues > showed up long before that with 20.00.00.00 (ideally I'd like to retest > that, but I don't have a stashed copy of that firmware). > > To reiterate, this is with FreeBSD 9.3, and in this particular case the > HBA is a 9205-8e. > > I expect I'll get to re-test within the next few weeks with FreeBSD > 10.2. But for now it seems like firmware 20.00.04.00 has the previous > problems fixed. I meant to reply to myself earlier - I now have been running 10.2 with the 20.00.04.00 firmware for a while now, and it does seem stable. Graham
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?563BAE81.6000409>