From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Dec  1  2: 3: 1 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4A03237B400; Fri,  1 Dec 2000 02:02:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id eB1A2wE27586;
	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 02:02:58 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 02:02:58 -0800
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: alc@freebsd.org
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: why doesn't aio use at_exit(9)?
Message-ID: <20001201020257.R8051@fw.wintelcom.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

why doesn't aio use at_exit(9) instead of requiring an explicit
call in kern_exit.c for aio_rundown?

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message