From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 27 20:22:50 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3691065670
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:22:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at)
Received: from fep22.mx.upcmail.net (fep22.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4CEA8FC08
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:22:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from edge02.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep20-int.chello.at
	(InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP
	id <20110327200734.JMHY23900.viefep20-int.chello.at@edge02.upcmail.net>;
	Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:07:34 +0200
Received: from mole.fafoe.narf.at ([213.47.85.26])
	by edge02.upcmail.net with edge
	id QL7X1g01G0a5KZh02L7Y2P; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:07:34 +0200
X-SourceIP: 213.47.85.26
Received: by mole.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 2D4586D449; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:07:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:07:30 +0200
From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at>
To: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz>
Message-ID: <20110327200729.GD2651@mole.fafoe.narf.at>
References: <20110328083657.35507caf@fubar.geek.nz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110328083657.35507caf@fubar.geek.nz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=kR4HTYXl3FXdRAFjS5RpcnDbDNViz/VYMWXR75RtSM0=
	c=1 sm=0 a=wom5GMh1gUkA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10
	a=Gaqorc8aOXfLKk6E3KMA:9 a=trd_ArCYm0Nqc5ymy0uCi2sgijoA:4
	a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Unsigned wchar_t
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:22:50 -0000

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:36:57AM +1300, Andrew Turner wrote:
> Along with this WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX are defined both in <wchar.h>
> and <machine/_stdint.h>. I would like to remove the copy from wchar.h
> and add an include to machine/_stdint.h.
> 
> Would there be any problems with either of these or is there a better
> place to put the __wchar_t typedef and define WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX?

The C standard specifies that both <wchar.h> and <stdint.h> shall define
WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX. You cannot simply include <machine/_stdint.h>
from <wchar.h> because the former contains a lot of other macros.

Stefan