From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 15 20:10:08 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: rc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D9982F
 for <rc@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:10:08 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from prvs=16965695d1=killing@multiplay.co.uk)
Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C1B8FC0A
 for <rc@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:10:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from r2d2 ([188.220.16.49])
 by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23])
 (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50001365939.msg
 for <rc@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:10:01 +0000
X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:10:01 +0000
 (not processed: message from valid local sender)
X-MDRemoteIP: 188.220.16.49
X-Return-Path: prvs=16965695d1=killing@multiplay.co.uk
X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rc@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <1F93E0D525B946B88405EC4203385E0A@multiplay.co.uk>
From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
To: "Chris Rees" <utisoft@gmail.com>, "Kostik Belousov" <kostikbel@gmail.com>
References: <6A58ADA440454E5889DBA6D2D9C56180@multiplay.co.uk><CAF6rxg=UoSONKXLub7RFTK6Hi7oXRgJ0c7gvhOXW53sa2h964Q@mail.gmail.com><20121215091424.GS71906@kib.kiev.ua>
 <CADLo839yEpvMC_BhBzmJ2heNtdUtNHCQymqho4AkJP0hVfdr5g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Adding dependency on mountlate to mountd
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:09:58 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
 reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Cc: rc@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation."
 <freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-rc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:10:08 -0000

---- Original Message ----- 
> From: Chris Rees 
> On 15 Dec 2012 09:14, "Konstantin Belousov" <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It cannot be fine. It breaks local NFS mounts.
>
> Given that we can't have both, but we can have nullfs and thus solve this problem.
> Is there something that local NFS mounts can do that nullfs won't?

Using local NFS mounts seems a bit of strange thing to do, whats the
reason for the requirement for these?

Wouldnt nullfs mounts replace this requirement and perform better?

    Regards
    Steve

================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 

In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.