From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 10 15:02:19 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F5F106567D
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:02:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kfl@xiplink.com)
Received: from smtp191.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp191.iad.emailsrvr.com
	[207.97.245.191])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E25D8FC36
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:02:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kfl@xiplink.com)
Received: from relay9.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by relay9.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AC39F1E21A3
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:02:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by relay9.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender:
	kfodil-lemelin-AT-xiplink.com) with ESMTPSA id 9E4D11CCA41
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:02:18 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <49DF5F75.6080607@xiplink.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:02:13 -0400
From: Karim Fodil-Lemelin <kfl@xiplink.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: m_tag, malloc vs uma
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:02:20 -0000

Hello,

Is there any plans on getting the mbuf tags sub-system integrated with 
the universal memory allocator? Getting tags for mbufs is still calling 
malloc in uipc_mbuf.c ... What would be the benefits of using uma instead?

Karim.