From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 17:49:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4341E106564A for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5618FC1E for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:49:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB1Hnlma010684; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:49:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mB1HnkOT010681; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:49:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 18:49:46 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Kirk Strauser In-Reply-To: <200812010959.15647.kirk@strauser.com> Message-ID: <20081201184722.S10680@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200812010959.15647.kirk@strauser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disenchanted with ZFS; alternatives? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:49:59 -0000 > I have ZFS on my 7.1-PRERELEASE system, and while it does some spiffy things, > in general I'm a bit underwhelmed. UFS is excellent. your problem is that you like to have "lots of filesystems". why don't just make one or one per disk? i have one per disk/mirror configuration everywhere except one place where i made separate filesystem for /var/spool/squid for some reasons. tell me what's your needs and how many/what disks you have. UFS is best-performer on real load, runs on almost no RAM, but uses more if available for caching.