From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 21 14:10:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04E816A4B3 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shaft.techsupport.co.uk (shaft.techsupport.co.uk [212.250.77.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22A143F85 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:10:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com ([81.103.67.204] helo=shrike.submonkey.net ident=mailnull) by shaft.techsupport.co.uk with esmtp (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1AC3mF-0002Hg-DN for chat@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:10:51 +0100 Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1AC3mD-000Nnu-QR for chat@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:10:49 +0100 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:10:49 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: chat@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20031021211049.GN3708@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , chat@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WjpOG6URjntW8FAF" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Ceri Davies Subject: FAO Kevin Kinsey X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:10:54 -0000 --WjpOG6URjntW8FAF Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="mmR5Tf+WJGm+vTLg" Content-Disposition: inline --mmR5Tf+WJGm+vTLg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kevin, This is retarded. Not only is your MTA rejecting mail and not saying why, but it's also doing it for mail addressed to postmaster. Apologies to the rest of the list, but I'm pretty short of options... Ceri --=20 --mmR5Tf+WJGm+vTLg Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: <> Envelope-to: setantae@submonkey.net Delivery-date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:07:11 +0100 Received: from shaft.techsupport.co.uk ([212.250.77.214]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1AC3id-000Nn6-H8 for setantae@submonkey.net; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:07:07 +0100 Received: from mailnull by shaft.techsupport.co.uk with local (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1AC3ic-0002HE-6K for setantae@submonkey.net; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:07:06 +0100 X-Failed-Recipients: postmaster@southernuniform.com, postmaster@daleco.biz Auto-Submitted: auto-generated From: Mail Delivery System To: setantae@submonkey.net Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Message-Id: Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:07:06 +0100 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-rc3 (1.202-2003-08-29-exp) on shrike.private.submonkey.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-102.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BIZ_TLD, MSGID_FROM_MTA_BACKUP,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=2.60-rc3 This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: postmaster@southernuniform.com SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL FROM:: host secure.southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]: 550 5.0.0 Access denied postmaster@daleco.biz SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL FROM:: host secure.southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]: 550 5.0.0 Access denied ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------ Return-path: Received: from cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com ([81.103.67.204] helo=shrike.submonkey.net ident=mailnull) by shaft.techsupport.co.uk with esmtp (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1AC3iY-0002H9-Fl; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:07:02 +0100 Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1AC3iW-000Nmu-RE; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:07:00 +0100 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:07:00 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: postmaster@daleco.biz, postmaster@southernuniform.com Cc: Ceri Davies Subject: [Mailer-Daemon@shaft.techsupport.co.uk: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender] Message-ID: <20031021210700.GM3708@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , postmaster@daleco.biz, postmaster@southernuniform.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZjLa2K+dB9SFbrgo" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Ceri Davies --ZjLa2K+dB9SFbrgo Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="K0M4iRgkWWXhiQ9N" Content-Disposition: inline --K0M4iRgkWWXhiQ9N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It would be a good idea to provide some idea why the mail was blocked. Fancy giving me a clue? Cheers, Ceri --=20 --K0M4iRgkWWXhiQ9N Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: <> Envelope-to: setantae@submonkey.net Delivery-date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:58:03 +0100 Received: from shaft.techsupport.co.uk ([212.250.77.214]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtp (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1AC3Zo-000Nkm-Mz for setantae@submonkey.net; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:58:00 +0100 Received: from mailnull by shaft.techsupport.co.uk with local (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1AC3Zn-0002G9-E3 for setantae@submonkey.net; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:57:59 +0100 X-Failed-Recipients: kdk@daleco.biz Auto-Submitted: auto-generated From: Mail Delivery System To: setantae@submonkey.net Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Message-Id: Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:57:59 +0100 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-rc3 (1.202-2003-08-29-exp) on shrike.private.submonkey.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-101.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BIZ_TLD, MSGID_FROM_MTA_BACKUP,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=2.60-rc3 This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: kdk@daleco.biz SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL FROM:: host secure.southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]: 550 5.0.0 Access denied ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------ Return-path: Received: from cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com ([81.103.67.204] helo=shrike.submonkey.net ident=mailnull) by shaft.techsupport.co.uk with esmtp (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1AC3Zj-0002G4-G8; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:57:55 +0100 Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1AC3Zh-000Nki-77; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:57:53 +0100 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:57:53 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Kevin Kinsey Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/58318: missing modifier in crontab(5) manpage (changes meaning...) Message-ID: <20031021205753.GL3708@submonkey.net> References: <200310210533.h9L5XqXV060412@ezekiel.daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200310210533.h9L5XqXV060412@ezekiel.daleco.biz> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Ceri Davies On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:33:52AM -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > > >Description: > Examination of context clearly shows that the word "Not" should appear > in the statement "Lists and ranges are allowed to co-exist in the > same field...." > >How-To-Repeat: > $man 5 crontab > # read the "Extensions" paragraph(s) I think you'll find that they *are* allowed (that is the nature of the extension). Read the paragraph again, bearing in mind that you are reading about Vixie cron: Lists and ranges are allowed to co-exist in the same field. "1-3,7-9" would be rejected by ATT or BSD cron -- they want to see "1-3" or "7,8,9" ONLY. i.e. this cron does allow it. Ceri -- --K0M4iRgkWWXhiQ9N-- --ZjLa2K+dB9SFbrgo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/lZ/0ocfcwTS3JF8RAnBqAJ0WJSgnPsnYYQSvknjXaeDDI+STRgCgvSkI +KnTr4eJb0gmi5lYPS13sCo= =kva7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZjLa2K+dB9SFbrgo-- --mmR5Tf+WJGm+vTLg-- --WjpOG6URjntW8FAF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/laDZocfcwTS3JF8RAgU1AJ9wfIOa8rN5UpjnvR63Xrq9878sHgCfSVWX 8kE8n4ecBaqCj7F1vK8k4iU= =ke3P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WjpOG6URjntW8FAF--