From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Feb  5 10:26: 4 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BED37B401
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  5 Feb 2003 10:26:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from carbon.berkeley.netdot.net (carbon.berkeley.netdot.net [216.27.190.205])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1573243FA3
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  5 Feb 2003 10:26:02 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nick@netdot.net)
Received: by carbon.berkeley.netdot.net (Postfix, from userid 101)
	id D4D2BF80A; Wed,  5 Feb 2003 10:26:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:26:01 -0800
From: Nicholas Esborn <nick@netdot.net>
To: Bruno Afonso <hununu@netcabo.pt>
Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: The way forward
Message-ID: <20030205182601.GA59212@carbon.berkeley.netdot.net>
References: <20030128085617.L167@woody.ops.uunet.co.za> <3E415602.30669.FF9FC2@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3E415602.30669.FF9FC2@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-security.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-security>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-security>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Here here on pf envy.  It's not well tested yet, but pf's architecture
and capabilities look better than both ipf and ipfw.

-nick

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:20:50PM -0000, Bruno Afonso wrote:
> On 29 Jan 2003 at 21:45, Scott M. Nolde wrote:
> 
> > Give ipf and ipfw a whirl and get the best out of both.  I also hear 
> > there's AltQ coming to ipf in FreeBSD and there are patches for it, if you want
> > to try it.
> 
> Where did you read that? AltQ is not natively implemented in 5.0... the AltQ kernel 
> patches are available, but I'd love ipf + Altq integration. At the moment, I envy pf + altq on 
> openbsd.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Bruno Miguel Afonso, Biological Eng. student.
> brunomiguel at dequim dot ist dot utl dot pt
> D.E.Q. @ I.S.T. - Portugal
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message

-- 
Nicholas Esborn
Unix Systems Administrator
Berkeley, California

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message