Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:26:01 -0800 From: Nicholas Esborn <nick@netdot.net> To: Bruno Afonso <hununu@netcabo.pt> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The way forward Message-ID: <20030205182601.GA59212@carbon.berkeley.netdot.net> In-Reply-To: <3E415602.30669.FF9FC2@localhost> References: <20030128085617.L167@woody.ops.uunet.co.za> <3E415602.30669.FF9FC2@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Here here on pf envy. It's not well tested yet, but pf's architecture and capabilities look better than both ipf and ipfw. -nick On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:20:50PM -0000, Bruno Afonso wrote: > On 29 Jan 2003 at 21:45, Scott M. Nolde wrote: > > > Give ipf and ipfw a whirl and get the best out of both. I also hear > > there's AltQ coming to ipf in FreeBSD and there are patches for it, if you want > > to try it. > > Where did you read that? AltQ is not natively implemented in 5.0... the AltQ kernel > patches are available, but I'd love ipf + Altq integration. At the moment, I envy pf + altq on > openbsd. > > > > > Bruno Miguel Afonso, Biological Eng. student. > brunomiguel at dequim dot ist dot utl dot pt > D.E.Q. @ I.S.T. - Portugal > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message -- Nicholas Esborn Unix Systems Administrator Berkeley, California To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030205182601.GA59212>