From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 07:24:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8483CB for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:24:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pntr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45E812F86 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id ea20so4072277lab.41 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:24:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=zfz3nSFVzs9T1CqaLl0Bch1/1zNJgbnF8fVFUwp/wVg=; b=dzR78v3bzJFiZGqkHTQgihW4VE/V0h/x5wKgaRBcL6gg+L1bssQQxSP/A2Zp2mbWH8 WoCtk1AhbJtbOudlloFGwxXH44L3jA2Cq0gzmIY8Vek6TMnKgAq/GuJLmTSrLK3SkSHm 5CGlKXrggEdOMtOxeuLtOt5cyMBbPGqNj16hyReKrsYTjBoy4A+GniaaovSPPoZOd9hq 26zIPQql1tqbH3iy9cmxXmiVl36pvvzmvnbfiK0DyuWypvT8eSq+zZZVGRrBf/gVB/ue ZN/70rq13DaB9Ro0GDSiYr2G9kMNiXTz0JXHKTX8v5CtodCJlz/M0OR9EfxAMhz/UdJC q6jg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.21.10 with SMTP id r10mr73746lae.52.1380525891210; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:24:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.58.195 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:24:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130929212104.GB1370@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> References: <20130927000728.GB19167@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <20130927081221.GK41229@kib.kiev.ua> <20130928023046.GA1428@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <20130929212104.GB1370@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:24:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.2-RC4 amd64 panic: vm_page_unwire From: Oliver Pinter To: John Marshall Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Konstantin Belousov , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:24:53 -0000 On 9/29/13, John Marshall wrote: > On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, 17:27 +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote: >> On 9/28/13, John Marshall wrote: >> > On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, 11:12 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:07:28AM +1000, John Marshall wrote: >> >> > The first two panics were triggered when shutting down the ntpd >> >> > daemon >> >> > (a recent development snapshot version of ntpd: 4.2.7p387). Exiting >> >> > a >> >> > later release (p388) has not triggered the panic. The system >> >> > panicked >> >> > again overnight, this time while acting as an sftp server receiving >> >> > large (GB) files from another system. >> > >> >> > I have made the core.txt.[0-2] files available in the following >> >> > directory. The directory is not browsable. >> >> > >> >> > http://www.riverwillow.net.au/~john/92rc4/ >> >> >> >> This might be fixed by r254087-r254090 on stable/9. >> > >> > Thank you. Those patches applied cleanly to releng/9.2 so I rebuilt a >> > patched 9.2. I double-checked and verified that the following patched >> > files in my releng/9.2@255904 working copy were identical to the same >> > files in stable/9@254090, then I removed /usr/obj/* and built a fresh >> > system. > >> > The system panicked as follows during shutdown after its first boot. >> > The corresponding core.txt.3 file is available at the same location >> > previously posted. > >> > I have now seen this panic on a second server as well (also amd64 but >> > different hardware vendor). This second (unpatched) system also >> > panicked during shutdown as follows. Corresponding file named >> > core.txt.0.system2 is available at the same location as above. > >> try this from 9-STABLE: >> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/98362329be8e2cdefda1988e5e9d32efbc94855f > > Thanks Oliver. If I followed the links correctly, that looks like > r255507 on stable/9. The second part of that patch didn't apply cleanly > to 9.2. I investigated and it looks like that is because r254442 had > also been applied since 9.2. I'm guessing I should also apply r254442 > as well (first)? I shall proceed with applying both patches, rebuild, > and see what happens. This patch affected only those kernels, that has cpuctl. When no cpuctl loaded, has no effect. > > -- > John Marshall >