From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org  Thu Sep 28 01:11:26 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F44E205B4
 for <freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E008C681E2
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:11:25 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.89 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
 id 1dxNMP-000Cj5-3i; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 03:11:29 +0200
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 03:11:29 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: Guy Yur <guyyur@gmail.com>
Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: if_awg fixes
Message-ID: <20170928011129.GC86601@home.opsec.eu>
References: <CAC67Hz9GzTeKmBfiCsJj=_cC=63gzEeJ7VbwJss4xk_oNLbaDw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAC67Hz9GzTeKmBfiCsJj=_cC=63gzEeJ7VbwJss4xk_oNLbaDw@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:11:26 -0000

Hi!

> I had issues with if_awg when passing heavy traffic
> (transmission, samba, ...)
[...]
> Comparing the driver against if_nfe which also uses a ring buffer,
> there are several issues with how the rings are programmed.
> I made changes inspired by it.
> 
> The following fixes improved the card behavior on my boards.
> (tested on Orange Pi PC and Orange Pi One)

Will you submit your patches via https://bugs.freebsd.org ?

Otherwise it's difficult to keep track...

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         3 years to go !