Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 03:11:29 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Guy Yur <guyyur@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: if_awg fixes Message-ID: <20170928011129.GC86601@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <CAC67Hz9GzTeKmBfiCsJj=_cC=63gzEeJ7VbwJss4xk_oNLbaDw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAC67Hz9GzTeKmBfiCsJj=_cC=63gzEeJ7VbwJss4xk_oNLbaDw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > I had issues with if_awg when passing heavy traffic > (transmission, samba, ...) [...] > Comparing the driver against if_nfe which also uses a ring buffer, > there are several issues with how the rings are programmed. > I made changes inspired by it. > > The following fixes improved the card behavior on my boards. > (tested on Orange Pi PC and Orange Pi One) Will you submit your patches via https://bugs.freebsd.org ? Otherwise it's difficult to keep track... -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170928011129.GC86601>