From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Nov 27 23:46:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45A237B417; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:46:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAS7j7V25431; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:45:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: Greg Lehey , developers@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: FreeBSD performing worse than Linux? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:41:18 MST." <15364.38174.938500.946169@caddis.yogotech.com> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:45:07 +0100 Message-ID: <25429.1006933507@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <15364.38174.938500.946169@caddis.yogotech.com>, Nate Williams write s: >Note, some of the performance issues were made better by disabling the >TCP newreno implementation, but it's still poor and very inconsistent >for hosts not on the local network, while the Linux box next to it gets >much more consistent results. For what it's worth I have disabled newreno at my customer sites as well and felt and heard less "bogosity" since. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message