Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:48:27 +0100 From: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> To: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@FreeBSD.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Enabling IPSec panics stable/9 (runs OK on stable/8) Message-ID: <4F057FFB.5080909@fsn.hu> In-Reply-To: <20120105103723.GA33970@zeninc.net> References: <4F044A0B.3020108@fsn.hu> <20120104145155.GA31550@zeninc.net> <4F046D95.3070106@fsn.hu> <20120104163131.GA31787@zeninc.net> <4F057980.7080307@fsn.hu> <20120105103723.GA33970@zeninc.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/05/12 11:37, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: > Strange..... may be related to some kind of code optimization.... > > As the line juste before is: > saidx =&sav->sah->saidx; > > Could you show the value of&sav->sah->saidx ? > And also check if kgdb can print sav->sah->saidx (without the&) ? Oh sorry, the previous console copy was chopped. I've tried sav too: (kgdb) p sav->sah->saidx Variable "sav" is not available. > To help you having a quick workaround, do you really need ESP+AH ? > Most of the time, people who configure ESP+AH just needs in fact ESP > with optional data authentication. I could live without it, you are right. Thanks for the tip. > And the crash occurs in some part of the code which deals with > encapsulation in encapsulation. > > This also may explains why I never saw that crash...... Could be. Anyways, it's a permitted option, so it would be good to fix it. I hope I can help you in that somehow. :) Thanks,
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F057FFB.5080909>