From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 17 23:43:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mta4.snfc21.pbi.net (mta4.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.142]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF24151C4 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 1999 23:43:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jazepeda@pacbell.net) Received: from zippy.dyn.ml.org ([207.214.149.247]) by mta4.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.09.16.21.57.p8) with ESMTP id <0FLD00KKOUPSLZ@mta4.snfc21.pbi.net> for current@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 17 Nov 1999 23:41:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.dyn.ml.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC6D9154C; Wed, 17 Nov 1999 23:41:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 23:41:52 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Zepeda Subject: Re: PATCH for testing In-reply-to: <19991118071602.A24640@titan.klemm.gtn.com> To: Andreas Klemm Cc: David Greenman , Matthew Dillon , Sean Eric Fagan , current@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Andreas Klemm wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 05:44:12PM -0800, David Greenman wrote: > > I agree that we need to get rid of 'e' and any other options that allow > > reading another process's environment. > > I think it would be sufficient, to allow only root to use the 'e' option. > There is no need to get rid of it entirely. Then other utility would have > to go as well (tcpdump, ...). Or perhaps restricting -U to root only? Since -e w/out -U isn't harmful, no? - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message