Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:33:49 -0800 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: Jin Guojun <jguojun@sbcglobal.net> Cc: questions freebsd <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why ue0 do ARP on non local address when using static route? Message-ID: <8EFB78FF-51C4-4C69-AB6C-D2B239AF7E2B@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <1360793841.81458.YahooMailRC@web180902.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1360787737.17354.YahooMailRC@web180906.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <4A4F390A-3F42-41ED-9D19-EB4CE20DB148@mac.com> <1360793841.81458.YahooMailRC@web180902.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Jin Guojun wrote: > /etc/ethers does not help because there is no way resolve the IP by = QFHN in ethers. I'm not sure what "QFHN" is, but setting up an entry in /etc/ethers = provides the IP to MAC address mapping that ARP attempts to provide = dynamically. > The correct way is to use router IP (10.234.37.1) between 10.234.37.0 = and 10.227.148.0 instead of interface IP (10.234.37.80) for static = route. Assuming there's a router at 10.234.37.1 which knows how to get to = 10.227.148.52, yes. Regards, --=20 -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8EFB78FF-51C4-4C69-AB6C-D2B239AF7E2B>