From owner-freebsd-questions Mon May 20 21:00:14 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA19874 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 20 May 1996 21:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from io.org (io.org [198.133.36.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA19867 for ; Mon, 20 May 1996 21:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zot.io.org (taob@zot.io.org [198.133.36.82]) by io.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id XAA11339; Mon, 20 May 1996 23:59:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 23:59:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Tao To: Michael Smith cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NE2000 Plus not probed correctly? In-Reply-To: <199605210348.NAA24738@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 21 May 1996, Michael Smith wrote: > > Odd. Can you see if you can find out what the blob on the card is > (ie. is it an 83C90, or someone's clone?) This is what I got back from Ean (the fellow with the cards): | Here are the numbers I found on the card: | n82s123n | m5m5165fp (two of them with the samsung logo on them) | dl3516a (big chip in the middle of the board) | dp83910an | dp8392c | 16r4bcn The "dp83910an" and "dp8392c" look significant? -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org, taob@ican.net) Systems and Network Administrator, Internet Canada Corp. "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"