From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 5 02:42:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A4B16A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 02:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail010.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail010.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BEB43D1D for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 02:42:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anubis357@optusnet.com.au) Received: from rdlax10-a146.dialup.optusnet.com.au (rdlax10-a146.dialup.optusnet.com.au [198.142.5.146])i359gKB19460 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 19:42:21 +1000 From: anubis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 19:47:20 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <001701c41a13$fd5eb640$965ca818@personalx10qdm> In-Reply-To: <001701c41a13$fd5eb640$965ca818@personalx10qdm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404051947.20987.anubis357@optusnet.com.au> Subject: Re: 2.6 out performs FreeBSD?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 09:42:25 -0000 On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 5:10 pm, paul wrote: > I know this benchmark is a little outdated and has probably been > discussed before http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/ > > but I was like wtf when I saw this, is this a legit benchmark? > Anyone out there in the "FBSD" community wanna benchmark 5.2.1 or > 4.x vs Kernel 2.6. I would be interested in seeing what a properly > tuned system would look like in this benchmark > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Benchmarks dont mean dick to me. Performance is an overall package not just a single number. I want the ease of use, support and stability that you can only get from bsd