From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 5 18:34:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1077437B424 for ; Sat, 5 May 2001 18:34:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA15511; Sat, 5 May 2001 21:34:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.3/8.9.1) id f461Y6o72220; Sat, 5 May 2001 21:34:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15092.43534.763282.601897@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 21:34:06 -0400 (EDT) To: Daniel Eischen Cc: Bruce Evans , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Rfork'd threads, signals, and LDTs In-Reply-To: References: <15092.6577.733823.946525@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Daniel Eischen writes: > > We're still OK with the change to FreeBSDs native signal trampoline > though, right? I'll hold off on the Linux emulator changes until > we can figure out what the problem is. Yes, I was just commenting on the linulator patch you posted. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message