From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jun 30 12: 7: 6 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C965714FE3
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id VAA56297;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:06:53 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: tcpdump(1) additions.
References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990629184555.2905A-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 30 Jun 1999 21:06:53 +0200
In-Reply-To: Bill Fumerola's message of "Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:54:06 -0400 (EDT)"
Message-ID: <xzplnd1zewi.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> writes:
> Unless there is strong feelings against it, I'd like to commit the smb
> patches (as seen on www.samba.org) and ipsec/ike patches (recently mailed
> to the tcpdump mailing list and bugs@FreeBSD.org) to tcpdump(1).

Will they be included in a future official release of tcpdump? Can we
afford to wait until then, and simply merge in the next release when
it comes?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message