From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 08:48:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2AC16A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:48:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (s142-179-111-232.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.111.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5A443D1D for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:48:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sandy@krvarr.bc.ca) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j158mN37012526; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:48:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sandy@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca) Received: (from sandy@localhost) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id j158mMmk012523; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:48:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sandy) From: Sandy Rutherford MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16900.34902.204175.909440@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca> Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:48:22 -0800 To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" In-Reply-To: References: <20050204060106.GB51807@gothmog.gr> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.3.1 X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster@krvarr.bc.ca for more information. X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact postmaster@krvarr.bc.ca for details. X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner-From: sandy@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: Chris Hodgins cc: Gert Cuykens cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ssh default security risc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 08:48:47 -0000 >>>>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:54:14 -0800, >>>>> "Ted Mittelstaedt" said: > restrictions somehow doesen't exist. Not to mention that even without a > static IP assigned > to your home or other locations that you normally ssh in from, it's > pretty > simple to block off huge chunks of the Internet, particularly blocks > assigned > to Red China, where a huge amount of cracking and spamming originates > from. For what it's worth (not much), most of the cracking attempts that have been showing up recently in my logs are from the USA. Of course, I can still go ahead and block the entire address range of the ISP. Sandy