From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 24 12:35:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F191565D for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 12:35:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA07346; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 12:59:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 12:59:02 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Yaroslav Terletsky Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List , altq@csl.sony.co.jp Subject: Re: Panic with 3.4: rtfree Message-ID: <20000124125902.E26520@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from ts@polynet.lviv.ua on Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 06:51:11PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Yaroslav Terletsky [000124 09:44] wrote: > > Dear Coders, > > One of my routers being upgraded to 3.4-STABLE (as of Dec 30 1999) > crashes *very* often with panic("rtfree"); > (With old 2.2.2 branch it works ok.) > > It is cool in testing evnironment but after few minutes in real cond. > (I think due to higher traffic and RT manipulations) it crashes. > My RT is about 70 entries in size, maxusers 32, NMBCLUSTERS=2048. > I'm also using ALTQ 2.0 (it does not patch sys/net/route.c). > > Any suggestions why it is and how to fix this problem? Why do you have such a low maxusers/NMBCLUSTERS setting? I can understand the maxusers, but lowering NMBCLUSTERS on a router doesn't seem like the right thing to do. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message