From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 12:42:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CC1106566C for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onyx@z-up.ru) Received: from mx.z-up.ru (mx.z-up.ru [92.50.244.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE20C8FC12 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ob15_2.ktz.lan (unknown [172.16.0.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.z-up.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF93E1149C for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:42:47 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Kolosov To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:44:24 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; i386; ; ) References: <201110182335.15862.onyx@z-up.ru> <201110201434.50399.onyx@z-up.ru> <20111020105558.GB3818@izebigyomicsoda.praudit.hu> In-Reply-To: <20111020105558.GB3818@izebigyomicsoda.praudit.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110201644.25653.onyx@z-up.ru> Subject: Re: Battery charge limiting X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:42:59 -0000 > for thinkpads, there is no need to reverse any win32 stuff.. there is a > linux driver that accesses the EC and is able to get/set battery > parameters (among other stuff, like HDAPS) called tp_smapi > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/tpctl/) Ok. It looks like not every EC capable to be controlled, there is some kind of active and passive ECs. How we can guess the one IS capable? May be presence of some ACPI methods is the symptom of such capabilities? Any suggestions?