From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 22 16:54:55 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0E310656CB;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:54:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net)
Received: from mail.droso.net (grizzly.droso.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:7021::5])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834F48FC1F;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:54:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 20048606F9; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:54:54 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:54:53 +0100
From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org>
To: Greg Larkin <glarkin@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20110222165453.GH22667@droso.net>
References: <201102220418.p1M4Idj6063729@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4D63B796.3080406@FreeBSD.org>
	<20110222154854.GA18003@lonesome.com>
	<4D63DF94.1080209@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D63DF94.1080209@FreeBSD.org>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/amd64 8.1-RELEASE
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/websh Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:54:56 -0000


--pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:08:52AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote:
> On 2/22/11 10:48 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:18:14AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote:
> >> Is it a good idea to decrement PORTREVISION after the previous commit
> >> has been in the tree for some number of hours?
> >=20
> > Nope.  For instance, if a pointyhat run _had_ been started during that
> > window, the uploaded package would now be wrong.
> >=20
> > mcl
>=20
> What's the proper fix at this point - rebump to current PORTREVISION+2,
> or is a PORTEPOCH bump required?
>=20
Just reinstating it to PORTREVISON+1 should be good enough.  There's no
need to get the, few, people that may have upgraded during the time to
upgrade again to +2.  PKGVERSION needs to be the same or higher, it just
cannot go down.

-erwin

--=20
Erwin Lansing                                   http://droso.org
Prediction is very difficult
especially about the future                    erwin@FreeBSD.org

--pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFNY+pdqy9aWxUlaZARAmtpAJsGQWU5mlR9K1yGs/vpZAVWuAKg9wCeOj2U
qVCpq0v/1Iko0Am22PJYmZw=
=Uyvz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw--