From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jun  3 14:45:22 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA24951
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 14:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA24945
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 14:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA04785;
	Tue, 3 Jun 1997 22:43:33 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <199706032143.WAA04785@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG,
        Ari Suutari <ari.suutari@ps.carel.fi>
Subject: Re: natd 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Jun 1997 21:25:10 PDT."
             <9360.865311910@time.cdrom.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 22:43:33 +0100
From: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > Does anyone have any objections to me bringing natd into the main
> > source tree under libexec ?
> 
> As long as it's updated to use libalias at the same, I see no reason
> why not.  This is definitely one of those pieces of software which has
> good reason to be bundled (unlike one of my all-time favories, tn3270 :-)

But of course :)  That's why libalias is a lib !
I believe Ari is doing (or has done) this right now.

> 					Jordan

-- 
Brian <brian@awfulhak.org>, <brian@freebsd.org>
      <http://www.awfulhak.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....