From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 17 14:15:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A579637BC50 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:15:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id GAA14188; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 06:15:37 +0900 (JST) To: snap-users@kame.net Cc: Lars Eggert , stable@freebsd.org, xbone@ISI.EDU In-reply-to: kris's message of Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:00:16 MST. X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 2942) Re: KAME/FreeBSD-stable merge From: itojun@iijlab.net Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 06:15:37 +0900 Message-ID: <14186.963868537@coconut.itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> is there any reason why the (misnamed, but that's another issue) XBONEHACK >> option was eliminated during the recent KAME/FreeBSD-stable merge? (File >> /usr/src/sys/net/if_gif.c.) It took us a while to get this added to KAME, >> and we'd really like to see it merged into FreeBSD. - it does not seem like a common option to me (it is just a quickhack for supporting special need at xbone project, which could have been handled as local patch), and it does not seem to me good for integrating into freebsd-current/releases - support issues (who handles questions about it? i don't want to) itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message