From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 16 3:16:41 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F98D37B407 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 03:16:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B013D43FDD for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 03:16:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 2BE49536F; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:16:28 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: phk@phk.freebsd.dk, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OPIE breakage: backout & patch for review From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:16:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20030216110725.GA99812@nagual.pp.ru> ("Andrey A. Chernov"'s message of "Sun, 16 Feb 2003 14:07:25 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) References: <20030216105605.GA99732@nagual.pp.ru> <5014.1045393137@critter.freebsd.dk> <20030216110725.GA99812@nagual.pp.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Andrey A. Chernov" writes: > But... Nonsense from my side happens only because > 1) I see the breakage. > 2) Seen breakage, I try to guess what des means, when he made it, > having no information from des. > 3) If I guess it (with no information) incorrectly, it not means > that breakage not exist, it still there. My message dated 2003-02-16 00:46:27 CET contained all the information you needed. Do you really think that your hysterical reaction, bombarding me with message upon incriminatory message and completely ignoring what I say unless it can be twisted into a confirmation of your theory, is the correct way of presenting your case and convincing me of the validity of your arguments? And do you always have to react as if every commit I make to any part of the tree with which you are remotely familiar is a personal attack against you? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message