From owner-freebsd-security Tue Jul 21 17:20:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA20654 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Tue, 21 Jul 1998 17:20:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gatekeeper.iserver.com (gatekeeper.iserver.com [206.107.170.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA20563 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 1998 17:20:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hart@iserver.com) Received: by gatekeeper.iserver.com; Tue, 21 Jul 1998 18:19:57 -0600 (MDT) Received: from unknown(192.168.1.109) by gatekeeper.iserver.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma004313; Tue, 21 Jul 98 18:19:38 -0600 Received: (hart@localhost) by anchovy.orem.iserver.com (8.8.5) id SAA09362; Tue, 21 Jul 1998 18:08:18 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 18:08:17 -0600 (MDT) From: Paul Hart X-Sender: hart@anchovy.orem.iserver.com To: Ben cc: Brett Glass , Jeremy Shaffner , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is there no info on the QPOPPER hack? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 21 Jul 1998, Ben wrote: > We went to using cucipop. You might try this too, it uses about 30% > less cpu, and doesn't have these exploits (yet? I haven't looked through > it's code) > > -> ftp://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/packages/cucipop/ The cucipop sources don't look anything like the procmail sources, do they? The author might be a good programmer but his C formatting style is probably the most horrible and wretched thing I have ever encountered. It is literally painful to read, and almost impossible to follow. Paul Hart -- Paul Robert Hart ><8> ><8> ><8> Verio Web Hosting, Inc. hart@iserver.com ><8> ><8> ><8> http://www.iserver.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message