Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Jul 1998 18:08:17 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Paul Hart <hart@iserver.com>
To:        Ben <spy@tyr.office.efn.org>
Cc:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, Jeremy Shaffner <jer@jorsm.com>, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Why is there no info on the QPOPPER hack?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSI.3.96.980721180531.8730A-100000@anchovy.orem.iserver.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980721141904.12932A-100000@Tyr.office.EFN.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 21 Jul 1998, Ben wrote:

> We went to using cucipop.  You might try this too, it uses about 30%
> less cpu, and doesn't have these exploits (yet? I haven't looked through
> it's code) 
> 
>  -> ftp://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/packages/cucipop/

The cucipop sources don't look anything like the procmail sources, do
they?  The author might be a good programmer but his C formatting style is
probably the most horrible and wretched thing I have ever encountered.  It
is literally painful to read, and almost impossible to follow. 

Paul Hart

--
Paul Robert Hart        ><8>  ><8>  ><8>        Verio Web Hosting, Inc.
hart@iserver.com        ><8>  ><8>  ><8>        http://www.iserver.com/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.96.980721180531.8730A-100000>