From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jul 29 22:27:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA09584 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jul 1997 22:27:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA09571 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 1997 22:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.62 #1) id 0wtRID-0007lj-00; Tue, 29 Jul 1997 22:27:25 -0700 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 22:27:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , Rod Ebrahimi , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pentium II? In-Reply-To: <10120.870215860@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 29 Jul 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Not, not quite. At the same clock rate, the PPro is faster, but the PII > > can operate at 266mhz, while the PPro maxes at 200mhz. > > Of course, everyone I know (myself included) runs their PPro/200 at 233. :-) > > Jordan My PPro 200 (with 512k cache) doesn't run at all clocked at 233... Tom