From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sun May 29 15:29:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F608B53B89; Sun, 29 May 2016 15:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451A6121D; Sun, 29 May 2016 15:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 43BBB126A; Sun, 29 May 2016 15:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 15:29:49 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: Mathieu Arnold , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r416053 - head/Mk/Uses Message-ID: <20160529152949.GA88078@FreeBSD.org> References: <201605281719.u4SHJiAa008852@repo.freebsd.org> <6084DC9FC0E493931C0C3D6B@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20160528200254.GI1036@fc.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160528200254.GI1036@fc.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 15:29:49 -0000 On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 10:02:55PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > [...] > > I should explain a bit more. > > > > This goes against the Right Way Of Doing Things(c)(r)(tm). > > > > To add a target to be run in the targets pipeline, you use _USES_xxx, you > > never, ever, piggyback on an existing target, especially if you're not > > using it. > > > > So, please, back this out. > > Done. I'm not sure *why* the kde folks requested this change > in the first place, so I'll ask them. In this case I'm even more puzzled: why commit a change that you don't fully understand? You should've asked them before committing, not after. Writing proper commit messages also helps: lack of "why" clause (or inability to come up with one) indicates that change is probably not committable yet. ./danfe