From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 18 08:31:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EE116A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:31:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DAA43D1F for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:31:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CqozK-00079h-EF for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:45:22 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0I8YvOh060782 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:34:57 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0I8Yv4G060772 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:34:57 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:34:57 +0600 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050118083457.GA57902@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20050116144113.GB66854@gothmog.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050116144113.GB66854@gothmog.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:17:05 +0000 Subject: Re: gratuitous gcc warnings: unused function arguments? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:31:22 -0000 On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 04:41:13PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > This allows the main() function to keep being compliant with the ANSI > standard that specifies only two valid prototypes for main(): > > int main(void); > int main(int argc, char *argv[]); Hmm, I might sound wrong, but I also recall seeing ``int main(int argc, char *argv[], char *envp[]);'' as valid main() prototype as well. ./danfe